Hall Lane / Knapton Road Junction
Knapton Road is the main traffic artery between North Walsham and Mundesley and as such is a relatively busy road. As the road climbs up to Knapton there is a 40mph speed restriction on the edge of the village which is all to often ignored by drivers. A few hundred yards further on Knapton Road bends right to bypass the village and it is on the beginning of this bend that Hall Lane meets it.
The location and design of the junction means that vehicles approaching the junction from Mundesley and entering Hall Lane do so without the need to make any discernible turn. This may explain why a dangerously high proportion do so without slowing down, even though the speed limit reduces from 40mph to 30mph. It may also explain why so many drivers fail to indicate as they assume that they are going straight on so don’t need to.
With the additional housing being built in Mundesley, this problem is only going to get worse and puts other road users and pedestrians at risk because there are no pavements at this end of Hall Lane which walkers could use to evade vehicles.
Approaching Hall Lane from Mundesley
Click to see the 30mph sign
This has long been a cause for concern for villagers and with the new Victory housing estate being built just yards away, this potentially dangerous junction will only get busier.
Approaching Knapton Road from Hall Lane
No pavement for pedestrians to escape oncoming traffic that ignore the reduced speed limit
The speed limit changes as vehicles enter Hall Lane from Knapton Road from 40mph down to 30mph and for the first 200m there is no pavement either side of the road.
We want to make a change to the design of the junction to;
- force vehicles approaching the junction from Mundesley to slow right down or stop at the junction before crossing / turning left into Hall Lane
to respect the 30mph speed limit and reduce the risk of hitting pedestrians forced to walk on the road
- force vehicles approaching the junction from Hall Lane to stop at the junction
to reduce the risk of collision with on-coming traffic from the left, which cannot be seen until vehicles actually reach the junction
Since an alarmingly high number of drivers approaching the junction from Mundesley are already ignoring the speed limit reduction (see details of our resident’s Speed Watch action) and some drivers from both directions are risking the safety of other road users and pedestrians alike by clearly not respecting the junction, the only way forward would seem to be to change the layout of the junction in such a way as to force them to slow down or stop. We also want to see additional signage both on the road and on roadside signs.
We have spoken with Highways who are sympathetic to our view and have even provided their thoughts on possible changes to the junction.
During our meeting with the Police and Highways, PC Gwynn drove us to the junction and approached it from all aspects. He said that anything that could improve safety for road users would be a good thing. Steve White of Highways suggested that change could be possible and that he would talk to a colleague who was more specialised in junction design. He also pointed out that although this would be subject to Highways approval, there is no budget available for this type of work and that the Parish Council would have to fund it, though he did suggest that the builders of the new estate on the Millenium Field, Victory Housing could – and possibly should – contribute, as the additional housing would obviously add more traffic on the junction.
He emailed the committee a day or so later to advise that he had spoken with his colleague and that not only was it feasible but that his colleague had offered one design suggestion (click on the image) and would be happy to consider others.
This has left the committee feeling very optimistic that we can make a difference to what has become a dangerous junction and we are currently discussing designs that will have maximum effect with a view to obtaining Highways approval.
As yet we have no idea of time scale but subject to funding, this could be measured in weeks or months as opposed to years.